<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Prevent Indexing at Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canonicalseo.com/prevent-google-indexing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canonicalseo.com/prevent-google-indexing/</link>
	<description>Learn SEO Free Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell C.</title>
		<link>http://www.canonicalseo.com/prevent-google-indexing/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonicalseo.com/?p=398#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Hey I just realized that you are mentioning the case where page is blocked in robots.txt but still appearing in serps dud to relevancy of outbound links...sorry for my bad:)

But I have observed that if this is the case with yahoo then meta noindex is not of use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey I just realized that you are mentioning the case where page is blocked in robots.txt but still appearing in serps dud to relevancy of outbound links&#8230;sorry for my bad:)</p>
<p>But I have observed that if this is the case with yahoo then meta noindex is not of use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell C.</title>
		<link>http://www.canonicalseo.com/prevent-google-indexing/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonicalseo.com/?p=398#comment-290</guid>
		<description>About last paragraph:
IMO, if a page is already in Google’s Index then the easiest way to remove it would be, simply blocking it in robots.txt and then use Google&#039;s removal tool.

Using noindex over robots.txt might be a better approach for page that is currently not showing up in searches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About last paragraph:<br />
IMO, if a page is already in Google’s Index then the easiest way to remove it would be, simply blocking it in robots.txt and then use Google&#8217;s removal tool.</p>
<p>Using noindex over robots.txt might be a better approach for page that is currently not showing up in searches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://www.canonicalseo.com/prevent-google-indexing/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonicalseo.com/?p=398#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Excellent explanation of the ways to prevent indexation, and the ways that don&#039;t work well. I took the other angle on my blog -- how to deindex once it&#039;s already indexed, especially for duplicate content -- and I recommended similar tactics in my post, with the addition of 301s, 404s and canonical tags. Love the focus of your blog, I&#039;ll have to keep an eye on it.
Thanks, Jill Kocher
http://WebPieRat.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent explanation of the ways to prevent indexation, and the ways that don&#8217;t work well. I took the other angle on my blog &#8212; how to deindex once it&#8217;s already indexed, especially for duplicate content &#8212; and I recommended similar tactics in my post, with the addition of 301s, 404s and canonical tags. Love the focus of your blog, I&#8217;ll have to keep an eye on it.<br />
Thanks, Jill Kocher<br />
<a href="http://WebPieRat.com" rel="nofollow">http://WebPieRat.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.canonicalseo.com/prevent-google-indexing/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canonicalseo.com/?p=398#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Nice article. It&#039;s amazing how many people think no-following a link will prevent Google from finding (and indexing) that page!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. It&#8217;s amazing how many people think no-following a link will prevent Google from finding (and indexing) that page!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
